‹ Back

There is an old saying, “One man’s trash is another man’s treasure.”

But perhaps we overlook something important. Before it became trash, it was someone’s treasure. A watch, a painting, a piece of furniture, a car, a house, even something as simple as an old photograph, can move through remarkably different stages of perceived value.

To one person, it represents memories, achievement, status, or sentimental attachment. Then circumstances change. The owner no longer wants it, needs it, or can afford to keep it. Suddenly, something that once represented value becomes disposable. Yet another person discovers it and sees something entirely different. The object has not necessarily changed. Our perception of its value has.

So, when exactly does treasure become trash? Is it when its financial value decreases? When it becomes unfashionable? When it loses its usefulness? Or simply when the person who once valued it no longer does?

Perhaps “trash” is often nothing more than treasure without the right owner, and that raises an uncomfortable question about materialism. If the perceived value of an object can move so dramatically between people, perhaps the object itself was never truly valuable.

Perhaps value is something we assign. One person sees something that has lost its worth. Another sees an opportunity to give it worth again. Maybe treasure never actually becomes trash. Maybe we simply stop seeing the treasure.