‹ Back

Sometimes, the way we judge a home reveal more about us than the home itself.

A beautiful house can be dismissed simply because it stands in an undesirable area. The walls may be immaculate, the garden beautiful, the rooms spacious, and the property perfectly suited to the person who will live there.

Yet someone says, “I would never live there.” Not because of the house because of the area.

Perhaps this reveals something deeper about perception.

We attach assumptions, reputations, social status, safety, and identity to geographical locations. An area becomes a label, and that label can overshadow everything else, but there is an interesting contradiction.

You live in the house.

The area surrounds the house, but it does not become your bedroom, kitchen, lounge, or garden. Of course, location matters. Security, infrastructure, accessibility, and future property value are legitimate considerations, but sometimes, the judgement goes beyond practical considerations.

It becomes social perception. The address becomes more important than the domicile and perhaps that tells us something uncomfortable about how easily we confuse where something is with what something is. A beautiful home does not necessarily become less beautiful because of its postcode.

Perhaps the real question is whether we are evaluating the property itself or simply reacting to everything we have been taught to associate with the place where it stands.